The Four Principles of Biomedical Ethics: A Foundation for Current Bioethical Debate

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1556-3499(13)60161-8Get rights and content

ABSTRACT

Objective

To provide an overview of the four principles originally developed by Thomas Beauchamp and James Childress are now used in modern bioethical decision-making and debate and to describe several challenges to their premier status in bioethics.

Discussion

The four principles that form the core of modern bioethics discussion include autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence and justice. The originators of these principles claim that none is more important than another, yet challenges have been laid against these principles on that basis as well as on other areas of disagreement. This paper looks at the nature of the most significant of those challenges.

Conclusion

The four principles have withstood challenge now for nearly 30 years and still form the basis for most decision making in both the research setting and in clinical practice within the chiropractic profession. However, professional understanding of the principles is not known and may provide a fertile area for further investigation.

REFERENCES (21)

  • TL Beauchamp et al.

    Principles of biomedical ethics

    (2001)
  • HT Engelhardt

    The foundations of bioethics

    (1996)
  • AR Johnson

    On the origins and future of the Belmont Report

  • J Feinberg

    Harm to self

  • DC Thomasma

    A philosophy of a clinically-based medical ethics

    J Med Ethics

    (1980)
  • R Gillon

    Philosophical medical ethics

    (1986)
  • R Gillon

    Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope

    Br Med J

    (1994)
  • J Harris

    In praise of unprincipled ethics

    J Med Ethics

    (2003)
  • AV Campbell

    The virtues and vices of the four principles

    J Med Ethics

    (2003)
  • J McCarthy

    Principlism or narrative ethics: must we choose between them

    Med Humanit

    (2003)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text